Falling from 60,000 feet is an extreme scenario, pushing the boundaries of human endurance and defying our everyday understanding of physics. While it’s not something the average person will ever experience, exploring the dynamics of such a fall offers fascinating insights into terminal velocity, air resistance, and the potential consequences. Let’s break down the factors that determine how long it would take to plummet from this incredible height.
Understanding the Initial Stages: Acceleration and Thin Air
The initial phase of the fall is characterized by rapid acceleration. At 60,000 feet, the air density is significantly lower than at sea level. This reduced density means less air resistance acting against the falling body.
Consequently, an object (or a person) will accelerate more quickly than it would closer to the ground. Imagine trying to run through thick molasses versus running through thin air – the same principle applies. The decreased resistance allows for faster acceleration.
It’s crucial to understand that this acceleration isn’t constant. It’s influenced by the continually increasing air density as the person descends. As the air becomes thicker, the resistance grows, eventually slowing the acceleration rate.
The Impact of Air Resistance: Reaching Terminal Velocity
Air resistance, also known as drag, is the force that opposes the motion of an object through the air. It’s directly related to the object’s size, shape, and speed, as well as the density of the air.
As a person falls, their speed increases, and so does the air resistance. Eventually, the force of air resistance will equal the force of gravity. At this point, the person stops accelerating and reaches what’s known as terminal velocity.
Terminal velocity isn’t a fixed number. It varies depending on factors such as body size, weight, and body position. A skydiver in a streamlined, head-down position will reach a higher terminal velocity than someone spread-eagled. A larger person will have a larger air resistance force acting against them at the same speed, so their terminal velocity might be different from someone who is smaller.
For a typical skydiver, terminal velocity is around 120 mph (193 km/h). However, at the very beginning of the fall from 60,000 feet, with the much thinner air, the initial terminal velocity would be considerably higher. Only as the person descends into denser air would the terminal velocity stabilize at a lower, more familiar rate.
Factors Affecting Terminal Velocity
Several factors influence how quickly a person reaches terminal velocity and what that velocity ultimately is.
- Body Size and Shape: A larger surface area exposed to the air will create more drag. A more streamlined shape reduces drag, allowing for a faster terminal velocity.
- Weight: A heavier person will experience a greater gravitational force, requiring a higher air resistance to achieve equilibrium, therefore resulting in a higher terminal velocity.
- Air Density: As mentioned, air density plays a critical role. Lower density at higher altitudes means a faster initial acceleration and potentially a higher initial terminal velocity before stabilizing at a lower altitude.
Estimating the Fall Time: A Complex Calculation
Calculating the precise time it would take to fall 60,000 feet is a complex undertaking. It’s not as simple as applying a single equation because the acceleration isn’t constant. It requires considering the changing air density, the evolving terminal velocity, and the individual characteristics of the falling object.
However, we can make an estimated calculation by breaking down the fall into segments. Initially, the fall is primarily governed by acceleration due to gravity in thin air. As the person descends, the influence of air resistance steadily increases.
Given the complexity, a simple physics formula like distance = 0.5 * acceleration * time2 is not sufficient. A more accurate estimation would require iterative calculations or computer simulations that take into account the varying air density and its effect on terminal velocity throughout the entire descent.
Ignoring the effects of changing air density, we could make a naive calculation. If a person were to reach terminal velocity almost immediately, at 120 mph (176 feet/second), a 60,000-foot fall would take approximately 341 seconds, or about 5 minutes and 41 seconds.
However, this is a significant underestimation because it ignores the initial period of faster acceleration in the thin upper atmosphere. The actual time would likely be longer.
A More Realistic Approximation
A more realistic approximation involves acknowledging the initial rapid acceleration. Let’s assume the person spends roughly the first minute accelerating significantly before settling into a more standard terminal velocity for the majority of the fall.
This initial acceleration would cover a significant distance. The remaining distance, fallen at a speed closer to typical terminal velocity, would then take a longer time to cover. Therefore, the actual fall time would be likely somewhere between 5 and 7 minutes. This is still a rough estimate but closer to reality than the calculation using only terminal velocity.
The Dangers of a Fall from 60,000 Feet: Beyond Time
While calculating the fall time is an interesting theoretical exercise, it’s crucial to acknowledge the extreme dangers associated with falling from such a height. The risks are far more significant than just the impact at the end.
-
Hypoxia: At 60,000 feet, the air is incredibly thin and contains very little oxygen. Without supplemental oxygen, a person would quickly lose consciousness due to hypoxia (oxygen deprivation). The lack of oxygen to the brain can lead to rapid brain damage and death.
-
Hypothermia: The temperature at that altitude is extremely cold, often far below freezing. Without proper thermal protection, a person would quickly succumb to hypothermia, a dangerous drop in body temperature.
-
Decompression Sickness: Rapid changes in air pressure can cause decompression sickness, also known as “the bends.” This condition occurs when nitrogen bubbles form in the bloodstream due to the reduced pressure. Symptoms can range from joint pain and dizziness to paralysis and even death.
-
Extreme G-Forces: During the initial acceleration phase, a person would experience significant G-forces, potentially causing strain on the body.
The Highest Survival Record: A Remarkable Case
The story of Vesna Vulović, a Serbian flight attendant, is often cited as an example of surviving a fall from a considerable height. In 1972, she survived the breakup of JAT Flight 367, reportedly falling approximately 33,000 feet. While this is an extraordinary survival story, the circumstances were unique. The plane broke apart at a lower altitude than 60,000 feet, and she was reportedly trapped inside a section of the aircraft, which may have acted as a partial parachute.
It’s important to note that her survival was incredibly rare and involved a degree of luck. A fall from 60,000 feet, without any mitigating factors, would almost certainly be fatal.
Conclusion: A Calculated Risk?
Falling from 60,000 feet is not a feasible, safe, or recommended activity. The physics involved are complex, with multiple factors affecting the speed and duration of the fall. Even with the most accurate calculations, the risks associated with such a fall are immense. Hypoxia, hypothermia, decompression sickness, and the terminal impact all pose life-threatening dangers. While the theoretical exploration of the fall is interesting, the reality of it is far too risky to contemplate. To accurately determine the time to fall 60,000 feet would require complex computer simulations taking into account many factors, but even the best result doesn’t make the scenario survivable.
How does air resistance affect the speed of a falling object from 60,000 feet?
Air resistance plays a crucial role in limiting the terminal velocity of a falling object. Without air resistance, an object falling from 60,000 feet would accelerate continuously due to gravity, reaching incredibly high and likely unsurvivable speeds. However, as an object falls through the atmosphere, it encounters air resistance, a force that opposes its motion.
The magnitude of air resistance increases with the object’s speed. Eventually, the force of air resistance equals the force of gravity, resulting in a state of equilibrium. At this point, the object stops accelerating and falls at a constant speed, known as its terminal velocity. This is why a skydiver doesn’t continuously accelerate to extreme speeds during a freefall from high altitudes.
What is terminal velocity, and how does it relate to the time it takes to fall 60,000 feet?
Terminal velocity is the constant speed a freely falling object eventually reaches when the force of air resistance equals the force of gravity. It’s the point where the object stops accelerating because the upward force of air resistance balances the downward pull of gravity. The value of terminal velocity depends on the object’s shape, size, and mass, as well as the density of the air it’s falling through.
In the context of a 60,000-foot fall, reaching terminal velocity significantly impacts the overall time of descent. Instead of continuously accelerating, the skydiver spends a considerable portion of the fall at a relatively constant speed. Therefore, the time to fall 60,000 feet is heavily influenced by how quickly terminal velocity is reached and the magnitude of that terminal velocity.
How does altitude affect air density and, subsequently, the speed of a falling object?
Altitude profoundly affects air density. As altitude increases, air density decreases significantly. This is because there’s less air pressing down from above at higher altitudes, leading to fewer air molecules per unit of volume. This change in air density directly impacts the speed of a falling object.
At higher altitudes where the air is thinner, there is less air resistance. This means an object can initially accelerate more rapidly. However, as the object falls and enters denser air at lower altitudes, air resistance increases, causing it to slow down and eventually reach its terminal velocity. The changing air density throughout the 60,000-foot descent makes calculating the precise fall time more complex.
What safety equipment is necessary for a jump from 60,000 feet, and how does it impact the descent?
A jump from 60,000 feet necessitates specialized safety equipment due to the extreme conditions. This typically includes a pressurized suit to protect against the low pressure and extremely cold temperatures, as well as an oxygen supply system for breathing at high altitudes where the air is too thin. A reliable parachute system with both main and reserve parachutes is, of course, essential.
The pressurized suit and oxygen system add weight and bulk, affecting the skydiver’s aerodynamics and, consequently, their terminal velocity. The suit’s design also impacts air resistance. Furthermore, any delay in deploying the parachute at the correct altitude after a prolonged freefall could be catastrophic, highlighting the critical role of reliable and well-maintained equipment.
Can a person survive a fall from 60,000 feet without a parachute?
Generally, surviving a fall from 60,000 feet without a parachute is extremely unlikely, bordering on impossible. The human body is simply not designed to withstand the forces involved, even with a potentially softer landing surface. The impact forces generated at terminal velocity would almost certainly be fatal.
While there have been extremely rare cases of individuals surviving falls from significant heights, these instances are typically due to a combination of luck, specific landing conditions (such as landing in deep snow or dense foliage), and the precise orientation of the body during impact. A controlled, intentional fall from 60,000 feet without a parachute would be an almost certain death sentence.
How does the position of the body during freefall affect the speed and stability?
The body’s position during freefall dramatically affects both speed and stability. By altering the body’s orientation, a skydiver can manipulate their surface area and, consequently, the amount of air resistance they encounter. A streamlined, head-down position minimizes air resistance, resulting in a faster terminal velocity.
Conversely, a more horizontal, spread-out position maximizes air resistance, slowing the descent and increasing stability. This allows for greater control over movement and orientation. Skilled skydivers use these techniques to perform aerial maneuvers and maintain a stable position relative to other jumpers before deploying their parachutes.
What are some real-world examples of people falling from high altitudes, and what lessons can be learned?
There are a few documented cases of individuals falling from high altitudes, some involving aircraft accidents and others involving intentional jumps. For instance, Felix Baumgartner’s jump from over 120,000 feet demonstrated the possibilities of surviving supersonic freefalls with specialized equipment and meticulous planning. These extreme examples provide valuable data for studying human physiology and the physics of high-altitude freefall.
Studying these events allows researchers and engineers to improve safety equipment, understand the effects of extreme environments on the human body, and refine techniques for controlled descents. Each incident, whether successful or tragic, offers insights that can contribute to safer practices in aviation, skydiving, and other related fields. Analyzing these falls helps refine our understanding of the interplay between gravity, air resistance, and human survivability.